Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts

Flexibility


The key to any sustainability is flexibility. The word, "sustainable", has become popular in the energy sector of the capitalist economy. It implies the production of energy with low environmental cost or impact. Basically, to sustain something implies keeping it going. Each of us has a single, precious life to sustain to the best of our ability with the help of society.

Linear thinking was the methodology of the male-dominated society of my youth. It was expected that a person would be classified in the educational system and steered into a career path to eventually be enabled to earn a living at a job which suited that person's abilities. One block built on another. One grade on another. One degree on another. One job title on another.

This linear thinking does not promote flexibility. In fact, it stifles it. And, today, we see those who are still working under this system of education in less affluent parts of society struggling to keep up with the non-linear evolution of technologies and economic structures. They feel left in the wake of a plow of socioeconomic change, which has ripped up the neat paths laid out for them earlier in life.

When I came to the awareness that I am different and part of a social minority which would not benefit from the traditional linear paths to acceptance and promotion, I realized that the linear model would simply not work for me , unless I consciously killed very basic parts of who I am. I did not see that as an option. I had struggled from childhood to function with psychological and physical impairments which challenged my acceptance by my own family, teachers and peers. I refused to stifle myself as entered adulthood to satisfy anyone's opinion of me.

So, I discovered that flexibility eased my anxiety and often opened paths otherwise obscured by the obvious road signs of linear thinking. A turning point for me came when I was 21. My first partner and I rented a house by the sea. We were both silly romantics. The rent was irresistibly cheap and the commute to work every day was horribly arduous.

The lovely Gothic cottage, with breathtaking views of an iconic Massachusetts town across a mast-studded harbor, leaked like a sieve, had a poltergeist and was equipped with a dying oil furnace which belched soot everywhere. We loved it. That is, we loved it until the landlord tried raising our rent after 6 months of a harsh winter there.

My linear mind was determined to stay there somehow. My partner, who was much less linear than I, just shrugged and went on with his life. He left it for me to figure out. I went to see my landlord. His brownstone in Boston's Back Bay, a family treasure, was decorated with gilted fresco ceilings, painted with cherubs. I was led by a housekeeper to the leather-upholstered parlor, where I sat in front of an ornate fireplace and speculated about the warm comfort the landlord had experienced the preceding winter, while my lover and I had huddled under quilts and blankets to keep warm. By the time my landlord and wife entered imperiously, I was quite ready.

I told him I would not be paying the rent increase. He replied that I must. He also said it was too late in the year to replace me with a summer tenant. His opinion, his linear opinion, was that I simply must stay and pay the increase. It was, he implied, the honorable thing for me to do. I don't recall all of what I said in response. I do remember it was along the lines of "you cheap Yankee bastard". Then I left without being shown out by the housekeeper.

For a week thereafter, I was tortured by the ethics of the situation. My linear thinking had me locked into powerlessness. I thought I'd never be able to get another place to live without a reference from my first landlord. He had threatened to pursue me legally if I left. I couldn't see step B from my step A to my step C. My partner, a truly wonderful but very liberated human being, was no help. He guiltlessly ignored the whole sitation and went about living life as usual.

One night, I had a dream. I woke up with a clear sense of what needed to be done. I bought a paper. I found an apartment listing that suited our meager budget. The new landlord, a man who lived on his property, took in my story, looked me over and extended his hand to seal the deal. The following weekend, we moved everything out of the Gothic cottage. We sighed and took in one last view of the harbor. I pushed the keys under the front door with a simple note telling the landlord what he could do with them.

We never heard from our Back Bay landlord, for whom linear thinking was a questionable privilege afforded him by linear-thinking ancestors with cannons and guns. I learned a valuable lesson. Flexibility in thought and action can mean the difference between stagnation and healthy movement. Following the playbook, dictated often by those with a vested interest in the stagnation of others, isn't always the way to proceed if you want to sustain yourself. Perhaps, it is not good for a society either.

This doesn't imply that I believe that any action in the name of flexibility or sustainability is right or good. I believe deeply in the rule of just law. However, the linear logic of law is not always just. It is often encrusted with class privilege and the weighed down by the influence of money, as we can see in our current political process. Maintaining a sense of personal flexibility by empowering oneself with information and developing a practical, daily ethical standard can greatly sustain personal development and freedom when confronted with injustice or unfair standards.

Freedom


"Freedom" is a word bandied about in today's discourse about legislation and political bias. Freedom from something? Freedom to do something? The state of being free?

In the current context of U.S. political debate, freedom is coming to mean individualism. Individualism, unbridled by social responsibility, enforced by law and government, is just a euphemism for anarchy. Anarchy, the absence of government or rule of law, is by nature violent and socially regressive.

I would suggest that a citizen who, informed that the broken health care system is imperiling the health of the economic fiber of the nation, rails against fixing the problem through elected, legislative government, is an anarchist. Now, given the choice between anarchy and socialism, I would most certainly choose democratic, legislative socialism.

It is important to see what reactionaries of any stripe have to offer behind their rages. I see no intelligent alternatives offered by the Tea Party Movement, for example. I do see a propensity for anger and violence. In my opinion, I see the same rage once whipped up by the Militia Movement in the 1990s. This led to incidents like the Waco Siege. I doubt any sensible U.S. citizen wishes to see our country repeat those unfortunate times.

Prison


The United States has 5% of the world's population and 23.6% of the world's prison population.

What does that say about the success of our government? What does it say about our culture? What does that say about the grand concept of Freedom, touted by the hypocrites in Congress and in the military-industrial complex (corporatocracy)?

In the United States at the end of 2001, 10% of the population owned 71% of the wealth, and the top 1% controlled 38%. On the other hand, the bottom 40% owned less than 1% of the nation's wealth. Now, according to some estimates, the top 10% of the US population hold 90% of the nation's wealth. This is attributed largely to the economic policies of the Republican administration from 2001-2009 and the subsequent continuation of their monetary policy by the current administration.

Equality


Equality as a human right begins in the mind of the individual.

Getting married does not make a gay man equal. Adopting a child does not make a lesbian equal. Going to Harvard does not make a black man equal. Running for President does not make a woman equal.

These are simply the outward signs of equality according to human law and convention.

I made myself equal in my own mind and heart when I revolted against a violent and domineering family. I was twenty at the time. It was the beginning of my adulthood and the beginning of my individual practice of personal evolution. I said "No!" to violence, insults and constant attempts to control my life by my parents. Until then, I was depressed, confused and impotent, just the way my family liked me to be.

No amount of mimicking or sincerely imitating an oppressor will give you your own equality and subsequent freedom. This has been the mistake of many conservative political movements for change in the status of minorities. The wealthy heterosexual elite in American society derive great pleasure from these attempts at being like them. But they will not surrender their power and oppression without fear of the consequences of not surrendering those evils. They fear one thing: Loss of money, whether it be in the form of personal property, corporate assets, political power or social power.

The only protection of human rights is constant protest of their abuse in the face of the abusers, those in power. The human rights of all will not be assured until the weakest among us are protected from violence, oppression and poverty. The core of that protest is each individual person's actualization of his/her personal equality. That begins with saying "No!" to those in one's life who hurt, oppress and impoverish.

Freedom


Freedom is not a product, a sales pitch, a slogan or an excuse for invasion and mass murder. Freedom comes only to the individual heart through liberation from attachment and aversion. The Middle Way, or Middle Path, is the path to true freedom. The Middle Path is found one step at a time. These steps constitute practice.

Propaganda



The human tendency to denial under stress is natural and impressive. Kubler-Ross researched and documented this thoroughly. Since her death, the pharmacological psychiatric industry has even tried to deny her findings, which would diminish the efficacy and necessity of some of their expensive pills. However, those in power are all too aware of human psychology and how to manipulate it.

Since 2000, the Republican operatives in the US have utilized propaganda to convince the American public that the coup which occurred in the Presidential election of that year was a legitimate democratic process. It is clear now that these same aggressive totalitarians allowed the terrorists to perpetrate the massacre of civilians and government employees in September of 2001 to further their hold on absolute power.

Cynical and power addicted men are capable of their own denial of their evil. They are also prone to project their evil onto those they fear. They fear anyone who threatens their grip on absolute power.

The war in Iraq is a tragic combination of greed for oil resources and that projection of evil onto a society which has been decimated by the US, led by the fascists who began their rule with the coup of 2000. Yes, it is a pathetic, costly, bloody mess. But, it is clear that the leaders of the US are so entrenched in their lust for their illegitimate and abusive control of the American government that they are still trying to propagandize the American people into believing they are doing what is best for Iraq and for the American people. To believe this would be insane. I am happy to see that the vast majority of Americans, when asked, are not insane. They are waking up from their own denial.

To be a free individual, a person must study all he can about the human condition. Freedom is not granted by governments. Freedom is an act of human consciousness. It is a practice.

Elite


The elite, who by aggression, wealth and/or ancestry lead lives of luxury, are an insulated human minority. Yet, they govern. The Bin Ladens know the Bushes. They are friends. Be conscious of the absurdity of war and diplomacy in a world manipulated for the comfort and amusement of the elite. Modern democracy, which is actually representative Republicanism, in which the people chose leaders from the elite by an easily manipulated election process, is a method propogated by the elite to control the many by offering them the illusion of control of their own lives.

Until the great majority of human beings become conscious of their individual mortality from an early age, through secular and comprehensive education, this pattern of the subjugation of the many to the will of the few will continue.

As a secular humanist with that education and understanding of my mortality and my place on the planet, I attempt to awaken as many individuals as I can. This is part of my practice. Freedom is not a political slogan. Freedom is the liberation from the slavery of self-delusion and self-subjugation to the elite.

War


War is barbaric, stupid and toxic to human evolution. Wars are always rationalized into great causes by the evil men who wage them. There is no such thing as a 'freedom war'. Freedom of all classes is precisely what wars prevent in the hands of the elite who wage them.

War is murder. War is mindless destruction. War by the United States in other countries is exploitation as well.

Begin to practice Peace today. Write to the government wherever you live, if you have that privilege, and denounce war, all war.

Others

The most difficult step to compassion can be practicing the awareness that others can have a completely different reality from the reality you assume to be universal. This understanding in every moment and every human contact requires the mindfulness of Bodhisattva, if not Buddha, mind. The misery of the current human condition is magnified by the widespread lack of interest in fostering this kind of mindfulness in the human mind. 'Spreading freedom' is a good example of this on a massive scale. The American President cannot possibly seek mindfulness and compassion. If he were to seek mindfulness and compassion, he would immediately take American soldiers out of Iraq. He would understand that the vague 'freedom' he intends to spread by violence is not freedom but more human suffering. So we can see mindfulness and compassion or their absence once we begin to seek them. This is the benefit of practice. We can then focus our energies on those who can help us with our quest for enlightenment and world peace. And we can turn from those committed to lies, violence and human suffering in order to satisfy their greed.

Tyrants

George Bush the Elder and his aristocratic wife, Barbara, heir to a media fortune, celebrated the Thailand King's birthday in Thailand this week. The Thai King, educated at Harvard University, subverted the democratically elected government of his country recently and supported a military coup, which still holds power. The American corporate-owned press has neglected this abuse of democracy for obvious reasons. Tyrants still roam freely on this planet. They feast at elaborate ceremonies together. They are lauded. Books are published which hail them as exemplary human beings. And, obviously from this birthday in Thailand, they all stick together. My practice entails resisting the tyranny of the few and of the many.

Elections

Yes, it's payback time here in America. The cycle of human folly. They have destroyed a country, thrown it into civil war, to satisfy our rage over 9-11. Now the masses are bored with Iraq. The media too, it seems. Perhaps the two are the same. So, with the mentality of 'Monday-Night Football', the Middle Americans may actually vote to the left. They weren't motivated by the potential gutting of Social Security. They weren't motivated by the Medicare drug plan to help the upper middle class (Republican base). They weren't even motivated by illegal immigration. IF America were truly a democracy, we would all have a big, red VOTE button on our computer keyboards and on our digital-TV remote controls. Could Middle Americans handle that responsibility? Perhaps not. Politics are a true test of my resolve to maintain my practice.